Courtcase against a black hole, september 10th
Scientists in Geneva Switserland will start to investigate the Big Bang on september 10th 2008 with a machine called ‘Large Hadron Collider’ which has cost over 9 billion dollars to make. The machine essentially rotates particles at high level speeds, which could cause them to collide and create a so-called ‘black hole’, a hole in space that sucks in all material surrounding it.
As I understand it a black hole the size of a match would be large enough to swallow the whole earth. Some scientists are so worried about this experiment they have gone to the European human rights court to try stop this experiment. However this will not stop the experiment as that court is way too bureaucratic to take fast decisions.
Main opponent of the experiment is Otto Rossler. He says it could spawn mini black holes which, within four years, could grow big enough to suck the earth inside out. I have googled Rossler. He is a scientist, but not at all a particles expert. This is his wikipedia page
Rossler writes:
“My own calculations have shown it is quite plausible that these little black holes survive and will grow exponentially and eat the planet from the inside,” he warned.
“I have been calling for CERN to hold a safety conference to prove my conclusions wrong but they have not been willing.”
Most likely Rosslers concerns are poppycock, however, but the thing is one can’t be absolutely sure about these sort of things, which does make the experiment sort of risky. But just how risky we will never know. Or at least not any time soon. Normally black holes wouldnt form at the amounts of energy the LHC controls, according to wikipedia:
Under standard theories, such an energy to produce a micro black hole is orders of magnitude greater than that which can be produced on Earth in particle accelerators such as the LHC (maximum about 1.15 106 GeV), or detected in cosmic ray collisions in our atmosphere. It is estimated[citation needed] that to collide two aggregates of fermions to within a distance of a Planck length with the currently achievable magnetic field strength would require a ring accelerator about 1000 light years in diameter to keep the aggregates on track. Even if it were possible, any collision product would be immensely unstable, and almost immediately disintegrate[citation needed].
The problem here lies at the start of the sentence: ‘under standard theories’ meaning we have very little experience in this field.
As I understand it a black hole the size of a match would be large enough to swallow the whole earth. Some scientists are so worried about this experiment they have gone to the European human rights court to try stop this experiment. However this will not stop the experiment as that court is way too bureaucratic to take fast decisions.
Main opponent of the experiment is Otto Rossler. He says it could spawn mini black holes which, within four years, could grow big enough to suck the earth inside out. I have googled Rossler. He is a scientist, but not at all a particles expert. This is his wikipedia page
Rossler writes:
“My own calculations have shown it is quite plausible that these little black holes survive and will grow exponentially and eat the planet from the inside,” he warned.
“I have been calling for CERN to hold a safety conference to prove my conclusions wrong but they have not been willing.”
Most likely Rosslers concerns are poppycock, however, but the thing is one can’t be absolutely sure about these sort of things, which does make the experiment sort of risky. But just how risky we will never know. Or at least not any time soon. Normally black holes wouldnt form at the amounts of energy the LHC controls, according to wikipedia:
Under standard theories, such an energy to produce a micro black hole is orders of magnitude greater than that which can be produced on Earth in particle accelerators such as the LHC (maximum about 1.15 106 GeV), or detected in cosmic ray collisions in our atmosphere. It is estimated[citation needed] that to collide two aggregates of fermions to within a distance of a Planck length with the currently achievable magnetic field strength would require a ring accelerator about 1000 light years in diameter to keep the aggregates on track. Even if it were possible, any collision product would be immensely unstable, and almost immediately disintegrate[citation needed].
The problem here lies at the start of the sentence: ‘under standard theories’ meaning we have very little experience in this field.

Dear workers, scientists and theoretical physisists, working on the Hadron Collider,
I have learned that there is a strong possibility that there is a fourth state of matter called Monatomic Atoms or High Spin Atoms.
The theory being that these atoms spin just fast enough to prevent them from forming molecules.
When A. Einstein was working on his Theories the technology to find them was not available.
Is this what was missing; are you trying to make a three sided square ?
Can you put your hands on your hearts and give me and my fellow citizens of the world a categoric assurance that you have proved or disproved their existence and included this in your calculations?
A simple Yes or No will suffice.
Yours, in hope,
Peter J.G.Hendry.
Domaine des Fontenilles
87360
Azat le Ris
France
While we certainly aren’t CERN i do appreciate your input. Interesting idea about Monatomic Atoms – where did you get it and how do you suppose it could influence this experiment?
Martijn
Asif We Will:P
hu is amy,steph,kayleigh hu ever you are your gay lol
hope the world dnt end though
:L Um Goneeeee..
Byee:P
Or just a bunch of bored kids that accidentally dropped by?
There are many websites discussing Monatomic atoms.
They were discovered 20yrs ago by David Hudson see;
http://www.rexresearch.com/ormes/ormes.htm
They can hide in molecules of other metals and may indeed explain the “missing matter”
WE NEED to and HAVE to do more research into this before we do these such experiments and the courts need to do something aswell as everyone else to stop this.