<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Loewak: independent media and news network &#187; grimoire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loewak.nl/tag/grimoire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loewak.nl</link>
	<description>Independent media network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Magical books</title>
		<link>http://www.loewak.nl/2008/05/29/magical-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.loewak.nl/2008/05/29/magical-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Benders</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hermetica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grimoire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occult books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occultism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loewak.nl/2008/05/29/magical-books/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently called Joshua Ray Stephens book &#8216;The Moth or the Flame&#8217; a &#8216;magical&#8217; book. In a mail he asked me if I meant what I was saying, but of course I didn&#8217;t define what I meant with &#8216;magical&#8217;. Perhaps I should say &#8216;magickal&#8217; as some people do, to differentiate from the Disney sort of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently called Joshua Ray Stephens book &#8216;The Moth or the Flame&#8217; a &#8216;magical&#8217; book. In a mail he asked me if I meant what I was saying, but of course I didn&#8217;t define what I meant with &#8216;magical&#8217;. Perhaps I should say &#8216;magickal&#8217; as some people do, to differentiate from the Disney sort of magic, but I have always found that a somewhat daft way of differentiating. It was started once by Aleister Crowley, I think, a man who was as irritating as he was interesting. When I was a teenager, around 15 or so, I read all books i could get my hands on about the occult. For years and years I exclusively read books about occultism, science fiction and higher physics. At some point I finished most books and kind of distilled what I found interesting: on the &#8216;occult&#8217; subject those were Crowley, Gurdjieff and Casteneda. <br />
<br />
Now, of course that was a teenage fascination. Obsession, even, and I threw away almost all my occult books when I moved to Turkey because I could hardly bear reading them later on anyway. I had long since moved on to philosophy and poetry, and most occult works are simply not well crafted enough to keep my interest. Nonetheless these three people did play a role in the formation of my world-view, and many years of practicing their techniques taught me that the mind can be mastered in ways not taught in conventional sciences. I have practiced a range of techniques for more than 15 years, including asana yoga, hatha yoga, ceremonial magic, astral work, kabbalah, kundalini, castanedian techniques and so on. But &#8216;occult literature&#8217; never interested me after I passed my 21st birthday. Whatever good these techniques are, the instruction manuals will always be just that, instruction manuals. And instruction manuals ain&#8217;t literature. <br />
<br />
So, what the &#8216;mob&#8217; defines as &#8216;magical books&#8217; ain&#8217;t magical books for me. I really detest most &#8216;occult art&#8217; and &#8216;magical books&#8217; and for a good reason: good art is always magical, so whomever calls a work &#8216;magical poetry&#8217; is somewhat insane or doesn&#8217;t know what poetry is. Yet, the same isn&#8217;t true about books. One simply can&#8217;t say that &#8216;all books are magical&#8217; &#8211; that&#8217;d be a nonsensical statement. <br />
<br />
A truly magical book is a rare phenomenon. It&#8217;s the synergy that does the trick: the design, the words, the shape, the colors, the intent put in it. A magical book is a very concentrated expression of someones essence. I feel that Joshua created something like that with &#8216;The Moth or The Flame&#8217; &#8211; it&#8217;s a very special work that is very carefully crafted. Maybe we should rather call it a &#8216;grimoire&#8217;, I have always liked that word much better. <br />
<br />
I keep practicing my skills and techniques, I spend about one to two hours a day on them. It&#8217;s greatly efficient since these skills allow me to completely renew or change my own energy levels. This is an extremely useful skill to have: recently I have been almost in a permanent state of being mind-blown by just about everything that surrounds me. But when I want to read magical books I have no use of &#8216;occult literature&#8217; and neither do I have any desire for &#8216;occultists&#8217;, frankly: they are a rather irritating and small minded crowd. They are simply unwilling to question their own premises, which is the first requirement of any sort of progress. Besides, all occult forums I have occasionally visited banned me usually within a few days time, which I take as as good a sign of enlightenment as anything else. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.loewak.nl/2008/05/29/magical-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

